What is your preference thin or chubby Why


Leave the archive and display this page in the standard design: The outing, which type of woman do you like (thin, chubby, fat?)


The following. After looking at the tit thread (http://www.forum-3dcenter.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=16517) for a long time out of boredom on the playground, I asked myself which type Woman you actually stand? I have consistently only been able to find fully figured people and skeletal structures there, which did not particularly appeal to me. Why? Very easily. I stand up chubby!
I do not know why. But when I can see the ribs of a supermodel like that, it turns me off incredibly. The same applies to the joints. It kind of hurts to see that. Something like that just looks too "brittle" to me. For me it is simply more beautiful to see when a woman has curves and no rough edges.
Is that what I'm ashamed of now, or can I find like-minded people here? :)

I hope that this will lead to a serious discussion in which one can have a friendly conversation about the various preferences.

Well, it has to be a little bit, without curves it's boring
and I don't just determine whether I like it or not by the stature of the woman.

Slim.
And in hardly any model you can see the ribs! Then they would not be a model, models are extremely skinny but not so that you can see the ribs, unless it is drugs and Alc. come into play. E.g. Gisele Bündchen or Heidi Klum, where do you see the ribs as you described? Slim is just awesome in every way. 1. because I find it more aesthetic, essential! 2. more freedom of movement in every respect;) 3. feel more comfortable in the arms of such a woman than in the upholstery of another. (especially in public) 4. They can dance better! very very important !!! ;) and and and...

@Gohan

To be honest, I totally agree with you. Women who I'm afraid of would break if they pick up a flower pot are not for me, no matter how "beautiful" they are. I can't say whether that means my preference is chubby, such terms are too superficial or meaningless for me. The fact is, beauty arises in the eye of the beholder, and so I would never have thought it possible in the past to have a girlfriend who is not blonde, and now I've had a brunette for over 5 years.
To get back to the topic, in my eyes, people with clearly visible bones simply look malnourished (for example, in hip jeans that are so popular nowadays, I prefer to see a pretty stomach there - rather athletic with a little muscle - than the hip bones). I don't mean that sarcastically, it's just not an ideal of beauty for me. To make it clear, in my Sturm und Drang time, I would have rather jumped through the beds with Pamela Anderson or even Anna-Nicole Smith than with Kate Moss. It just seems unhealthy to me.

Well, it has to be a little bit, without curves it's boring
and I don't just determine whether I like it or not by the stature of the woman.

That’s clear, but I’d not be able to determine whether I like a woman or not by looking. But let's start from the theory that all women would be "characterless" :) (And for women, all men would be ... is not that far removed from reality)

So I think it's normal ... what is normal?

So not fat, but no "skeleton" either ... normal

and what the previous speaker writes, I see it that way ... my last girlfriend wasn't exactly slim either, but what the heck, we got along well.

I thought it was all about the outside? Especially since you only go after the external anyway!

full figured = plump.

And starved is bah. You should already see that it is a woman, so bottom and bust size can be more than Moss ...

That's clear, but I wouldn't tell by looks whether I like a woman or not. But let's start from the theory that all women would be "characterless" (and for women, all men would be ... is not that far removed from reality)

Yep, I know a couple of characterless: D
I also only built in the 2nd sentence so that I don't get any complaints.

i only like women where there is something, they don't have to be fat, but things like ribs and joints, no thanks ... so better a little more than too little.

Slim does NOT mean seeing ribs etc. Slim means 3-4kg under optimal weight! Nowadays there are few women where you can see the ribs! And after the character you only know the woman / man as the second to choose, because the appearance counts for getting to know each other or are all people running around with a sign around their necks, "I'm gay, 1.93, nice ..."?

Slim means NOT seeing ribs etc. Slim means 3-4kg under optimal weight! Nowadays there are few women where you can see the ribs! And after the character you only know the woman / man as the second to choose, because the appearance counts for getting to know each other or are all people running around with a sign around their necks, "I'm gay, 1.93, nice ..."?
What do "sexual orientation" and height have to do with character?

As far as I've seen, nobody equated slim with "bony". Only a few said the latter is not their ideal of beauty.

Hmm my girlfriend has to be slim (is she: P ... very). Find it absolutely disgusting when the fat oozes out on the sides of hip pants: pukes :. That's how you can tell whether a girl is too fat or not, I think.
If girls are not that slim, they should at least dress accordingly. From that, I often find girls with more clothes very sexy, but that is absolutely dependent on the type of girl. The proportions just have to be right and make the girl a "bombaaaaaaaaa". ;)

Nothing at the front and just at the back, where should papa lift himself up?

So, I'll join the majority, until there's something to it. Not too fat, not too thin, but a little more plump if you prefer.

Hmm, I'd rather have jumped through the beds with Kate Moss than with ANS (and then puffed one or the other, etc: D)
I particularly like the T'Pol - ne type. I like very petite women (but not, "undernourished") as well as those with more curves (or not so slim). Always depends on the type. I tend not to like chubby ones.

For example, I once had a girlfriend who was rather normal weight, so not slim. When I saw her again, she had lost a lot of weight, very slim, but I liked it better before.

hard to describe, the main thing is that it looks like this:

http://www.marokratie.orthy.de/pics/stars/addicted2eszter/compilation-blue.jpg

then it occurs to me: a woman should look like "woman", so counting ribs or balls shouldn't be possible. I can do without broad shoulders and "beards" in any shape, as it should be reserved for the man.

I have to say that I am more than surprised by the opinions so far. Most people prefer normal to somewhat or chubby.
Everyone in my circle of acquaintances is totally slim and very meticulous.
Well, I know some very pretty chubby women, just for example Sophie Dahl, and I also prefer the more voluptuous. This is feminine in my eyes.
But as always: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder ...;)

What do "sexual orientation" and height have to do with character?

As far as I've seen, nobody equated slim with "bony". Only a few said the latter is not their ideal of beauty.

then where does the word character relate to the sign? nowhere! I meant the properties! Most of them are talking about skeletons, 1% of the girls are more nice, most are normal or chubby, then comes slim.

hard to describe, the main thing is that it looks like this:


then it occurs to me: a woman should look like "woman", so counting ribs or balls shouldn't be possible. I can do without broad shoulders and "beards" in any shape, as it should be reserved for the man.

I only say, 2kg makeup or 3kg ?????????????????, a woman should be pretty even if she is not made up !!!

then where does the word character relate to the sign? nowhere! I meant the properties! Most of them are talking about skeletons, 1% of the girls are more nice, most are normal or chubby, then comes slim.
Well, I read that out of the context of your posting. What characteristics do you mean then? We humans don't have more than the "external" and character traits, right? And you excluded the external ones.

I only say, 2kg of makeup or 3kg ?????????????????, a woman should be pretty even if she is not made up !!!


she also looks like this when she gets out of the shower. Of course I don't show that here.

Nice lips, shapely hips. a small waist, -> is that written correctly? A natural look that doesn't have to hide under a ton of make-up and a handful of breasts: smile:

Well, I read that out of the context of your posting. What characteristics do you mean then? We humans don't have more than the "external" and character traits, right? And you excluded the external ones.

Quote:

2005-02-24 14:35:52
Shaitaana I thought it was all about the external? Especially since you only go after the external anyway!

As a result, I am concerned with the external as well as the topic of this thread! Read more next time !!! And with regard to the character, I only said that people only go according to their appearance and then according to their character, there would be no other way, logical right?

I like slim women. Thin without a butt or fat with too much butt are not my thing. Everything has to fit together;)

Nice lips, shapely hips. a small waist, -> is that written correctly? A natural look that doesn't have to hide under a ton of make-up and a handful of breasts: smile:

Do you have big or small hands ????

If you're in love, it doesn't matter anyway: wink:. I've had everything from thin to plump. Of course you eat with your eyes but when you are in love your beloved is the prettiest thing there is anyway !!

3. I feel more comfortable in the arms of such a woman than in the cushions of another. (especially in public) ...

But that's weak ...: frown:

I prefer it when there is something to it. Can also be chubby (which I am a bit too;)). But I don't think really fat is beautiful anymore.

So, I'll join the majority, until there's something to it. Not too fat, not too thin, but a little more plump if you prefer.

Ack, exactly my phrase.
Slim, but not too thin (: confused:), and of course it doesn't just depend on the stature ...

and I don't just determine whether I like it or not by the stature of the woman.

Yep, I also see that as important to add.
In general, imho doesn't just depend on the external shape, whether it's figure, face, etc., but also directly on something like charisma. Actually on several things that cannot be captured in one photo.

Still, it would be a lie if I said that I could not answer the question posed by the thread. As a rule, I think thin / slim is definitely more beautiful.

In any case, I don't like "A woman like a dog house, a bone in every corner"; D

Rather built on normal to a little better :)

Purely superficial and only seen from the 3 points - slim to slightly chubby. A woman with 1.70m shouldn't have much less than 60kg.

More chubby and definitely a curvy bum. The Latina guy ...

I also prefer normal. but rather in the direction of chubby than in the direction of thin

But that's weak ...: frown:

What's wrong with that ??? there is in the ARMS of a chubby woman I do not feel so good! not when dealing with a.

small, thin, perfect physique, breasts not too important hrrr

and then in the science magazine "P.M." another article about women and their looks. How they look and what turns the typical German man on the most (but I don't share this opinion, I don't like slightly chubby women and big breasts aren't that important to me either ..)
but the article is awesome ;-)

I like slim women. Thin without a butt or fat with too much butt are not my thing. Everything has to fit together;)
Everything has to fit together (y) exactly ...
Whether it's Alexandra Maria Lara or Ruth Moschner, they both look good in their own way; (

rofl .. I'll describe my superficial opinion on men ...

see Ville Valo (Him) just not quite so thin ^ - ^ or Leth * laugh *


I saw her on the net recently:

http://img96.exs.cx/img96/8133/nutcracker902vu.jpg (http://www.imageshack.us)

"She" should look something like this. But can also have 2-3 kg more.

As you can easily see, I'm also more into the "thin" ones, although there are limits here as well. Bones suck, but so does fat. The mean is it ... but hard to find. ;)

Hair color ... hmm. In the meantime I have noticed that I am only fascinated by dark-haired individuals of the opposite sex - but I won't commit myself because of that. ;)

Kind regards,
Raff

LOL ...... the "old" colleagues had recently discovered on the net.

http://ember.lycos.de/xapaterum/xapa/oha/Image78.jpg

Complete gallery (http://haben.lycos.de/xapaterum/xapa/oha/)

The saddle pad is really bad .......; D

make a mod out of it poll?

http://ember.lycos.de/xapaterum/xapa/oha/Image92.jpg

Give the girl something real to eat. ; (

Uhhh ... That's anorexia to the power of 10 ... Abnormal

Oh where ......... it depends on the airbags .....; D

I would like to remind you that we are off-topic here.
Accordingly, a serious discussion should take place here.

This applies in particular to =] nuEVO [=. Pull yourself together a little.

I just wanted to list the different tastes ....... some like naturally rustic (nice hairy), others just more "normal" and still others a little more "plump".

: D

I saw her on the net recently:

http://img96.exs.cx/img96/8133/nutcracker902vu.jpg (http://www.imageshack.us)

"She" should look something like this. But can also have 2-3 kg more.

As you can easily see, I also prefer the "thin" ones, although there are limits here as well. Bones suck, but so does fat. The mean is it ... but hard to find. ;)

Hair color ... hmm. In the meantime I have noticed that I am only fascinated by dark-haired individuals of the opposite sex - but I won't commit myself because of that. ;)

Kind regards,
Raff

Could it be that you're in cuddles? Because there is such a girl, but she has no style. It looks way too bumpy and fluffy. I like slim girls, but they shouldn't have much to no make-up, be very natural and have totally faithful eyes. Hair is very important to me ... Personally, I like breast size very small, it's much more beautiful, I don't know why. Hair color should be natural, I don't care which one. But green eyes would be so beautiful. But much more than anything that has been discussed in this topic is character. Because without that you can simply save yourself the rest of the work here, ... people are already poor enough;)

No, I'm not there. What's this? Such an internet dating or chat portal? I don't believe in anything (anymore)

Because of anorexia: As I said, you can still have a few pounds more on your ribs (and elsewhere: D). What I wanted to show were facial contours and "coloring". Otherwise I would have posted her damn well-shaped ass right away. ;)

Kind regards,
Raff

P.S: Yep, character has priority. But I think this thread is about looks. :)

I think she should be too fat rather than too thin. There must be a little something about a woman.

P.S. Someone has to explain to me why her face can be seen in so few pictures. She really doesn't have to pull a bag over her head.

No, I'm not there. What's this? Such an internet dating or chat portal? I don't believe in anything (anymore)

Because of anorexia: As I said, you can still have a few pounds more on your ribs (and elsewhere: D). What I wanted to show were facial contours and "coloring". Otherwise I would have posted her damn well-shaped ass right away. ;)

Kind regards,
Raff

P.S: Yep, character has priority. But I think this thread is about looks. :)

Yes, it is a chat room. I don't think much of it anymore either, most people are too superficial about that. You don't need to go online. Aside, because of the other topic ...
The facial contours are really good, you're right.But the bottom doesn't have to be fat, just beautifully shaped, like a beautiful flower. Appearance and character, I think a little looks first, then character and then character again. But if you have known someone for a long time, the appearance can also play an almost insignificant role. When 2 souls have found each other, everything else becomes gray and meaningless. And it all boils down to the search for true love anyway, which is sure to exist, but just not that often. And most people pigeonhole someone because of looks, too. How are you supposed to get out of there again? Personally, I like the one with the lollipop better: D; everyone likes something different ...

Hats off guys ...

I thought I was expecting an orgy of pictures in the thread.
But I think it's ridiculous to create a topic here in the forum.

Samnya


Hello!!!

So I looked for and found the woman of my life (I've been married to her for over 1/2 year now) * grin *. I used to like more women / girls where there was "something" to it. But then my opinion suddenly changed and my ideal of beauty is 49 - 51 kg with a height of 170 cm. so I wouldn't say that she looks skinny, it's just my IDEAL :-) !!!!!

Mfg Djon

Hats off guys ...

I thought I was expecting an orgy of pictures in the thread.
But I think it's ridiculous to create a topic here in the forum.

Samnya

I can be wrong, but haven't completely different threads been opened here? : |

For me, a nice buttocks and nice legs are somehow important, titties rather unimportant.

vBulletin®, Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.