Why do people believe in UFOs

It might not be so stupid to believe in aliens

But what is the key to populating other planets, galaxies or universes at some point? In a presentation at the Consortium for Space Genetics at Harvard Medical School, it is said that people who are best suited to space exploration are those who are able to recognize supernatural things - that is, have a kind of sixth sense. Behind this presentation is Garry Nolan, a molecular biologist specializing in genetics at Stanford University. In his presentation, Nolan described the brains of such people as "hyper" and explained that there are many dangers in exploring space, such as radiation or the slow rocket engines. Because of such factors, NASA is increasingly relying on rover vehicles and other discovery technologies. Nolan believes that the people who make the right decisions in a split second should take over exploring alien targets.

Strangely, or perhaps fittingly, the concept of this hyperintuition brings us back to Vallée. "Discernment" is one of the most effective research methods when it comes to dealing with the subject of UFOs. In other words: You have to be able to take the right path and achieve your intended goal even without relevant information. The term is derived from the Greek "aesthesis", which describes the process of fading out any distraction until one realizes the truth. In his work, Nolan establishes a connection between aesthesis and an actual correlate in the human body, which can possibly be changed or - according to Thomas' research - strengthened. As the views of these scientists show, the boundaries between technology and the human body continue to disappear.

Where will this admiration for non-human intelligence lead us? New religious and spiritual approaches also include technology, the future and the prospect of almost unimaginable infrastructures in space and on earth. And we are dealing with a new form of religion. A form that is not based solely on belief, but also on the fact that its theses could be true.

Or as Vallée puts it: The perceived absurdity of the theses does not mean that they are wrong.

Follow VICE on Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat.